Are you planning to move to a cloud-based environment? Many companies want to make a comparison of AWS and Azure before they can make their choice. Still, the fact is that both AWS and Azure are reliable performers with almost 99% of equivalence in the use cases. Deciding between Azure and AWS is more of a market choice and depends on the conditions of the company.

For instance, if the firm requires a solid Platform-as-a-service (PaaS) provider or wants integration of Windows, Azure would be the better choice; at the same time if they are looking for infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS ) or a different set of tools then AWS might be the excellent choice to make.

In this blog, we will do a comparison between the two cloud services, Azure vs AWS.

A Brief Summary of Amazon vs Microsoft Cloud

AWS is still leading the market in public cloud services followed by Azure and then Google Cloud. AWS and Azure contribute largely the same basic capacities throughout resilient compute, storage, networking and cost. Both yield the common components of a public cloud – self-service, autoscaling, pay-as-u-go pricing, security, compliance, identity access management features and immediate provisioning.

AWS vs Azure | Amazon vs Microsoft Cloud Comparison

AWS is quick as clients dream. The deployment time is rapid and thus impresses clients. Amazon cloud service is the largest of its kind, with over 2 million servers, a million customers, and $10 billion in revenue yearly. AWS controls nearly half of the cloud computing market share.

The most accomplished and experienced cloud player in service can extend a great list of computing services and functions of machine learning, mobile networking, deployments, etc. Meantime, rising at a rate of 120K new clients per month, 5 million companies utilising Azure Active directory, 1.4 million SQL databases, 40% of the profit generated from start-ups and more.


The practicality of cloud service providers is measured with their storage capacity. Operating services in the cloud include data processing that requires to be stored at any point in time. AWS’ storage services are the longest running, though, Azure’s storage capacities are also remarkably good. Both Azure and AWS are great in this kind and hold all the necessary characteristics such as REST API path and server-side data encryption.

Azure’s storage mechanism is also called as Blob storage, and AWS’s is described as the Simple Storage Service (S3).AWS’s cloud object storage solution extends high availability and automatic replication over places. Brief storage in AWS begins running when an instance commences and ends when an instance terminates also gives block storage that is like hard disks and can be connected to an EC2 instance or retained separately.

Azure employs temporary storage and page blobs for VM based volumes. Azure’s Block Storage alternative is similar to S3 in AWS. There are two classes of storage given by Azure -Hot and Cool. Cool storage is relatively less pricey than Hot but one has to acquire extra read and write costs.


The best cloud service provider can further scale to 1000’s of processing node in only a couple of minutes. For companies that require high-speed data analysis or graphics rendering, there are two options ready – purchase extra hardware or switch to the cloud. This is the purpose of public cloud services.

For compute, Amazon Web Service’ primary solution is its EC2 instances which give scalable computing on-demand and can be customized for many options’ and also presents other similar services like the AWS Lambda, EC2 Autoscaling, container service, and Elastic Beanstalk for app deployment.

Azure’s compute contributions are based on VMs with various other tools such as Cloud Services and Resource Manager which assist to deploy applications on the cloud.

AWS still extends the widest range of services in the database, storage, close to 100 across compute, analytics, networking, developer tools, mobile, management tools, IoT, enterprise applications and security.


All software applications today need a database to store data. Azure and AWS both render database services, despite you need a relational database or a NoSQL offering. Amazon’s RDS (Relational Database Service ) and Microsoft’s similar SQL Server database both are profoundly available and strong and also give automatic replication.

AWS vs Azure | Amazon vs Microsoft Cloud Comparison

AWS works well with NoSQL and relational databases giving a mature cloud environment for big data. AWS’ core analytics offering EMR benefits to establish an EC2 cluster and provides integration with different AWS services. Azure also supports both NoSQL and relational databases and also Big Data through Azure HDInsight and Azure table.

Azure presents analytical products through its exclusive Cortana Intelligence Suite that issues with Hadoop, Spark, Storm, and HBase.Amazon’s RDS supports six successful database engines – MariaDB, MySQL, Amazon Aurora, Microsoft SQL, Oracle, and PostgreSQL while Azure’s SQL database service is completely based on MS SQL Server.

Azure’s interface and tooling make it simple to achieve various DB operations while AWS has more instance models which you can provision and get that extra authority over DB instances.

Networking and Content Delivery

Every cloud service provider extends multiple networks and associates that interconnect the data centres over the globe through different products. AWS provides Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) for consumers to build separated networks within the cloud.

A user can build route tables, individual IP address ranges, subnets, and network gateways in a VPC. Furthermore, Azure gives Virtual Network (VNET) for users to form isolated networks. Both AWS and Azure provide firewall option and solutions to stretch on-premise data centre into the cloud.


Expense is a significant determinant of appeal for organizations planning to shift to the cloud. With growing competition amongst cloud service providers, there has been a downward leaning on prices since some time now.

AWS and Azure grant free basic tiers with limited usage limits that let users try and use their services prior to the purchase. Moreover, both offer credits to get the recognition of newbies onto their cloud platforms.

AWS presents a pay-as-you-go model and charges per hour at the same time Azure’s price charging model is also pay-as-you-go, but they charge per minute. AWS can support you save more with prolonged usage- the longer you use, the less you pay. AWS instances can be bought based on one of the models described below–

AWS vs Azure

I have attempted to give some idea on AWS vs Azure in this blog. We cannot say who is the best in the cloud service providers as companies have the means to decide the most winning features from each of these cloud service providers to invest a multi-cloud strategy.

Companies that need great availability and flexibility must consider multiple-data centre hostings. The decision to adopt either of the platforms depending on the requirements of an organization how AWS vs Azure meet those.

Despite whatever the observations may be, settling on the appropriate public cloud service provider demands thorough analysis on what one actually wants and also what the service provider has to contribute.

The users are destined to be the beneficiaries in the race between AWS and Azure or any other cloud service provider as each of these providers attracts its customers with better offerings at a reasonable expense.

Apachebooster can boost your server speed. If you have a slow running website, ApacheBooster will improve server performance with proven extra advantages also. Experience the server troubleshooting within seconds.

(Visited 65 times, 1 visits today)